• Login
    • nothing


    • Forgot your Password?





  • Executive Service Options
  • Career Center
  • Resume & Coaching
  • Leadership Exchange
  • For Recruiters
  • Managing Your Job Search
  • Market Info & Trends
  • Career Goals
  • New Career Paths
  • Master Classes
  •  Search

Job Autonomy Can Be a Double-Edged Sword

  • Columbia Business School
  • August 1, 2017
  • 1 comment
  • Aetna, American Express, Columbia Business School, Dell, Edward Deci, Ely Weitz, facebook, Google, Greg Oldham, IBM, Jackson Lu, Joel Brockner, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Richard Hackman, Richard Ryan, Yoav Vardi, Zappos

Share This Article

businessman-with-sword.jpg“You can arrive to work whenever convenient.”

“Work from home whenever you wish.”

“You can play music at work at any time.”

These are examples of actual workplace policies from prominent companies such as Aetna, American Express, Dell, Facebook, Google, IBM, and Zappos. They have joined the ranks of many organizations in giving employees greater job autonomy, that is, more freedom to decide when, where, and how to do their work. And why not? Research by organizational psychologists such as Richard Hackman and Greg Oldham and by social psychologists such as Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, has shown that job autonomy can have many positive effects. The accumulated evidence is that employees who experience more autonomy are more motivated, creative, and satisfied with their jobs.

Against this backdrop of the generally favorable effects of job autonomy, recent research has shown that it also may have a dark side: unethical behavior. Jackson Lu, Yoav Vardi, Ely Weitz and I discovered such results in a series of field and laboratory studies soon to be published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. In field studies conducted in Israel, employees from a wide range of industries rated how much autonomy they had and how often they engaged in unethical behavior, such as misrepresenting their work hours or wasting work time on private phone calls. Those who had greater autonomy said that they engaged in more unethical behavior on the job.

In laboratory experiments conducted in the United States we found that it may not even be necessary for people to have actual autonomy for them to behave unethically; merely priming them with the idea of autonomy may do the trick. In these studies, participants were randomly assigned to conditions differing in how much the concept of autonomy was called to mind. This was done with a widely used sentence-unscrambling task in which people had to rearrange multiple series of words into grammatically correct sentences. For example, those in the high-autonomy condition were given words such as, “have many as you as days wish you vacation may” which could be rearranged to form the sentence, “You may have as many vacation days as you wish.” In contrast, those in the low-autonomy condition were given words such as, “office in work you must the,” which could be rearranged to, “You must work in the office.” After completing the sentence-unscrambling exercise participants did another task in which they were told that the amount of money they earned depended on how well they performed. The activity was structured in a way that enabled us to tell whether participants lied about their performance. Those who were previously primed to experience greater autonomy in the sentence-unscrambling task lied more. Job autonomy gives employees a sense of freedom which usually has positive effects on their productivity and morale but also can lead them to feel that they can do whatever they want, including not adhering to rules of morality.

All behavior is a function of what people want to do (motivation) and what they are capable of doing (ability). Consider the unethical behavior elicited by high levels of autonomy. Having high autonomy may not have made people want to behave unethically. However, it may have enabled the unethical behavior by making it possible for people to engage in it. Indeed, the distinction between people wanting to behave unethically versus having the capability of doing so may help answer two important questions:

  1. What might mitigate the tendency for job autonomy to elicit unethical behavior?
  2. If job autonomy can lead to unethical behavior should companies re-evaluate whether to give job autonomy to its employees? That is, can job autonomy be introduced in a way that maximizes its positive consequences (e.g., greater creativity) without introducing the negative effect of unethical behavior?

With respect to the first question, my hunch is that people who have job autonomy and therefore are able to behave unethically will not do so if they do not want to behave unethically. For example, people who are high on the dimension of moral identity, for whom behaving morally is central to how they define themselves would be less likely to behave unethically even when a high degree of job autonomy enabled or made it possible for them to do so.

With respect to the second question, I am not recommending that companies abandon their efforts to provide employees with job autonomy. Our research suggests, rather, that the consequences of giving employees autonomy may not be summarily favorable. Taking a more balanced view of how employees respond to job autonomy may shed light on how organizations can maximize the positive effects of job autonomy while minimizing the negative consequence of unethical behavior.

Whereas people generally value having autonomy, some people want it more than others. People who want autonomy a lot may be less likely to behave unethically when they experience autonomy. For one thing, they may be concerned that the autonomy they covet may be taken away if they were to take advantage of it by behaving unethically. This reasoning led us to do another study to evaluate when the potential downside of felt autonomy can be minimized while its positive effects can be maintained. Once again, we primed people to experience varying degrees of job autonomy with the word-unscrambling exercise. Half of them then went on to do the task which measured their tendency to lie about their performance, whereas the other half completed an entirely different task, one measuring their creativity. Once again, those who worked on the task in which they could lie about their performance did so more when they were primed to experience greater autonomy. And, as has been found in previous research those who did the creativity task performed better at it when they were primed to experience greater autonomy.

Regardless of whether they did the task that measured unethical behavior or creativity, participants also indicated how much they generally valued having autonomy. Among those who generally valued having autonomy to a greater extent, (1) the positive relationship between experiencing job autonomy and behaving unethically diminished, whereas (2) the positive relationship between experiencing job autonomy and creativity was maintained.

In other words, as long as people valued having autonomy, the experience of autonomy had the positive effect of enhancing creativity without introducing the dangerous side effect of unethical behavior.

So, when organizations introduce job autonomy policies like those mentioned at the outset, they may gain greater overall benefits when they ensure that their employees value having autonomy. This may be achieved by selecting employees who value having autonomy as well as by creating a corporate culture which emphasizes the importance of it. More generally, a key practical takeaway from our studies is that when unethical behavior is enabled, whether through job autonomy or other factors, it needs to be counterbalanced by conditions that make employees not want to go there.


About the Researcher

Within the broader field of organizational behavior, Professor Brockner is well known for his work in several areas, including the effects of organizational downsizing on the productivity and morale of the “survivors,” the management of organizational change, organizational justice, self processes in organizations and managerial judgment and decision making. He teaches the MBA elective course Managerial Decision Making, the Ph.D. course Individual and Collective Behavior in Organizations, and he is an active consultant and speaker to companies worldwide.


Relevant Programs from Our Partner, Columbia Business School

Developing and Leading High-Performance Teams
Maximize your impact by learning to develop team solidarity, “followership,” and broad support for change throughout your organization.
Download Brochure

Leadership Essentials
Improve your effectiveness by developing essential leadership abilities, including team leadership, emotional intelligence, conflict management, and leading change.
Download Brochure

Leveraging Neuroscience to Power Organizational and Individual Performance
Explore why some leadership styles are more effective than others and improve the way you think about, process, and execute leadership styles.
Download Brochure

Personal Leadership and Success
Breakthrough research in psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive behavior therapy informs techniques for tangible personal improvements and greater leadership skills.
Download Brochure



Columbia Business School

Columbia Business School

Columbia Business School is committed to educating and developing leaders and builders of enterprises who create value for their stakeholders and society at large; we accomplish this through our MBA, PhD, and Executive Education programs. We are equally committed to developing new scholars and teachers, and to creating and disseminating pathbreaking knowledge, concepts, and tools which advance the understanding and practice of management; we accomplish this through our faculty research and PhD programs. For more information, visit us at http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/execed/
  • S Prev
  • Next s

1 Reply to "Job Autonomy Can Be a Double-Edged Sword"

  • Amanda Fracanzani
    August 16, 2017 (12:59 am)
    Log in to Reply

    Intersting article, but I’d like to make a couple of points. First, autonomy cannot be mistaken for anarchy! Second, in my understanding, the role of a manager foresees creating a productive, motivating and stimulating environment for their Team to work in, but also to supervise the activities carried out, respecting a timeframe.
    Ultimately, culture plays a considerable role in the statements above. In some cultures too much autonomy would be considered unethical by the employees themselves and would be more damaging than productive. Thus generalisations are similar to statistics, open to interpretation.
    One fundamental ingredient that our world seems to lack miserably in this era is basic, common sense (unfortunately, not so common!). There will always be individuals who will be prone to taking advantage of such benefits, given too much freedom, whilst others will thrive and be super productive. Again, the role of a manager is to distinguish one from the other and put each member of their Team in a position to perform best given their individual traits.


Trustpilot


Resources

About Us
Partner with Us
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

Need Help? Your Member Services Representative is
here for you at 1-203-750-1030

© 2023 ExecuNet — All Rights Reserved

Social

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
(... although, we're really not sure what we'd do if you did!) Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.

Necessary Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.